Home
LiveShow
Videos
Channels
Blogs
Groups
People
Invite
Browse Country
My Home
Login
Signup
You are viewing "JewelShepard"
Profile
LiveShow
Videos
Photos
Blog
Music
LiveStart
JewelShepard
Gender
: Female
Age
: 101
Sign
: Capricorn
City
: Sherman Oaks, CA.
State
: California
Country
:
United States
Email Blog to a Friend
Processing....
Today
Week
Total
Posts
2
2
34
Comments
2
2
4
Views
37
56
7,935
Thumbs Up
4
4
6
Blog Archive
2009
December
September
May
2008
August
July
Political Thoughts...
Marriage and ABOUT LAST NIGHT
June
SUNDAY, JULY 13, 2008 (7:32 PM)
Return to JewelShepard's blog
Political Thoughts...
(I'm feeling
amused
)
Congress has voted to immunize telecoms for alleged illegal lawbreaking, terminate lawsuits against them for doing this, and pretty much bless any darn eavesdropping that the Bush administration wants to do on anyone without warrants or following the FISA provisions for warrants. Glenn Greenwald
www.salon.com/src/pass/sitepass/spon/sitepass_website.html
is as annoyed as I am, not so much at the Republicans but at Democrats, Mr. Obama included.
This was sold as — and reported in the press as — a "compromise proposal." But in a compromise, both sides give up something and regret some aspect of the agreement. A number of Democrats regret things in it but I don't see any Republicans unhappy at even a semi-colon in the bill. This kind of thing wouldn't happen if the Democrats had a majority in either the House or the Senate.
I could to some extent buy the argument that the telecoms should not be punished for doing what their government asked them to do. What I don't like is the precedent/principle that there is apparently no such thing as illegal surveillance any longer. I would like to see the following question put to those who supported this bill: "Give me a few hypothetical but possible scenarios for instances of government eavesdropping where you would say, 'Someone ought to go to prison for this.'"
If they can't name a couple then the Fourth Amendment is kinda meaningless, isn't it? And if they can name some, then the question is how we would ever know if they were occurring and how would we prosecute in an environment when the administration (any administration) could just say, "This is necessary for the War on Terror?"
Category:
News and Politics
349 Views | 0 Thumbs Up | 0 Comments
Add Comment
|
Email
Comments & Responses
Post Comment
Thumbs Up:
None
Text Comment:
1000
characters left
Saving Comment...
There are no comments yet.
Click Post Comments to add a comment!
Don't see the signup form?
Click here
Your Account
My Home
My Mail
My Videos
My Photos
My Blogs
My Groups
Tools
LiveCam (beta)
LiveVideo Lite
LiveVideo Xpress
LiveVideo Layouts
Developers
Promote
RSS
LiveVideo
What's New?
Report Bugs
Contact LiveVideo
Safety Tips
Terms of Service
User Rights Policy
Privacy Policy
Copyright
Sitemap
Support
Account
Channel
Copyright/Content
Director
Troubleshooting
Upload
Videos
© 2009 LiveVideo.com. All Rights Reserved.